DIA calls for nominations for TAB board

by Brian de Lore
Published 11th December 2020

Confirmation that the Department of Internal Affairs (DIA) is firmly controlling TAB NZ, as the process of phasing out RITA continues, is blatantly evident on the DIA website this week with a call for nominations for the new board.

Under the sub-heading of ‘Recent Announcements’ on the ‘Appointments to statutory bodies’ page, it states: “Board Members of TAB New Zealand nominations are now open. See Calls for nominations below.”

Last week, the assumption made here that the ‘selection panel’ would shoulder-tap prospective independent board members, which is likely to number four, isn’t entirely correct. The web page displays hyperlinks to the ‘nomination form’ and ‘candidate information,’ which indicates anybody is eligible to throw his/her hat into the ring.

The board will be seven members in total, of which three comprise a nomination from each of the codes. In addition to the codes, nominations for board positions were also called for from each recognised industry organisation, and Sport and Recreation New Zealand.

The Minister has the ‘power of veto’ of any person recommended by the panel

The Minister has the ‘power of veto’ of any person recommended by the panel, but given Minister Grant Robertson has minimal industry knowledge, it seems unlikely he would use that power once the names arrive on his desk.

Discovering the DIA appointments page was achieved purely by accident and very obviously wasn’t advertised to the broader racing community.  Racing over many years must be the least transparent sport going, and with the TAB under DIA control, nothing much will change, and we know progress and implementation will be slow.

The candidate information page says that nominations will close on Friday, 15th January, at 5.00 pm. It also says, in typical government department snails pace, a decision on the makeup of the board will happen by May 2021. The job spec follows:

$33,430 per annum for Directors

Further on it states: “Fees are subject to the requirements of the Cabinet Fees Framework, and have been set as $33,430 per annum for Directors, and as $66,685 per annum for the Chair.”

It’s possible a suitable candidate or two not currently in the sights of the selection panel may fit the criteria and be available to make a valuable contribution to the industry. If that’s you, then click on this link and download the nomination forms, etc:

https://www.dia.govt.nz/Appointments-to-Statutory-Bodies#current

The TAB could do with a valuable contribution at the highest level; it’s well documented here and elsewhere in recent history that poor administration and structure led to the decline that required the government bail-out of $50 million from Winston Peters at budget-time last May.

Before that, the Minister was given the document which outlined the formation of the TAB in 1951 with the thoroughbred and harness racing clubs underwriting the project at the not insignificant cost at the time of £50,000. But with Winston’s bail-out came assumed ownership by the Government, and what very recently was known as a body corporate but now comes under the statutory body process of the wing of the DIA.

Fundamentally, no business like the TAB should be under the control of the Government because public servants have an abysmal record of running businesses. Remember, the demise of racing in recent times has been at the hands of government appointees.

Here’s a three-minute video that highlights that claim:

The interesting thing about the future of TAB NZ is the decision on partnering. Without partnering, New Zealand has no racing future, in my view, and partnering will come in the first instance as an option or later as an inevitability.

The global betting landscape has changed dramatically over the past couple of years, but even more so in COVID-19 year. Our TAB here is up seven percent since August, and we might have some extra cash to pay off debt but not increase stakes.

But spending in the third quarter in New Zealand as a whole in 2020 is up $1.8 billion or 28  percent on the same quarter in 2019 – most of it online because everyone has been stuck at home. It’s a hiatus and will not be permanent.

In Australia, the increased betting has been much more dramatic. A racing.com programme last week called ‘After the Last’ was on wagering in which a number of the corporate bookmaking CEO’s were interviewed and they painted a different picture of the betting successes achieved in COVID-19 year.

Sportsbet: There has been a reactivation of dormant punters in the tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands

Sportsbet CEO Barney Evans said: “There has been a reactivation of dormant punters in the tens of thousands if not hundreds of thousands. The last quarter result drew an increase of 76 percent.”

Former administrator and punter, Mike Symons, backed up Evans when he said:

“It was like Saturday afternoon was the highlight of the week. Primary school parents formed new punters clubs – new punters have been born during this COVID era, and the challenge for Sportsbet, Pointsbet, Betfair and others is can you keep those punters engaged in racing when their diaries are opened up, and you’ve got school sports and other commitments on the weekend.

“Racing was the only sport in town, and we had a captive audience.”

“Racing was the only sport in town, and we had a captive audience.”

Evans followed up with these inciteful and encouraging comments:

“Every year at Sportsbet, there had been a one or two percent shift to sport from racing for five or six years, but now there’s been a significant shift back. There are about 500 to 600,000 sports punters who have taken up betting on racing this year.

“The Channel Seven coverage has been brilliant, and we have demystified racing for them – it’s visible to them.

“Punters are out there wanting to be informed. It leads to a deeper education of the punter and therefore more engagement with the sport and hopefully longevity with their involvement as a punter.

“We are racing’s marketing arm – we are reaching out to the audiences. We’re spending the money on marketing and getting them in, and we have to make sure we are merchandising racing more appropriately.

“We need to make racing more accessible to someone who doesn’t consider himself an expert.”

“We need to make racing more accessible to someone who doesn’t consider himself an expert.”

Would it not be good to hear someone from our TAB making such positive comments. But we hear nothing, not a word, and what we’ve heard in the past has often proved to be highly inaccurate.

The program displayed a graph which showed that from March to July 2019 in Victoria the percentage of betting was 75.5% through digital and 24.5% through retail. But in March-July 2020, the forced retail venue closures throughout COVID drove customer activity into digital to 90.9% and only 9.1% through retail.

The program emphasised the most significant win has been selling racing to sports bettors. It was the most significant upside.

Men aged 18 to 34 made up 79% of new account holders.

They got to dormant customers which then reactivated and new customers acquired from elsewhere and it led to an increase in overall market share. Men aged 18 to 34 made up 79% of new account holders.

Wagering with Sportsbet made $200 million profit in Australia during the pandemic. Sportsbet doubled its betting on the Melbourne Cup while Tabcorp went backwards by six percent because they were more reliant on retail, which COVID decreased.

In the 12-months prior to June 2020, the total spend by corporate bookmakers on marketing alone was $134  million.

We don’t market racing in New Zealand, which has to change. We got rid of radio and most believe that was a huge mistake, and Trackside needs to be free-to-air.

For all the reasons stated above, from the ‘After the Last’ programme, we badly need to partner our TAB and plug into their computer, and become part of a global betting market that’s continually changing and getting better.

To watch the program, here’s the link:

https://www.racing.com/videos/2020-12-02/after-the-last–021220#/

New boards for racing a chance to get transparency and accountability

by Brian de Lore
Published 4th December 2020

The Racing Industry is currently metamorhising into a new area of administrators and everyone at the coalface of the industry committed to racing should be nervous about what’s coming.

The difference this time is that the industry has no room to move with an ASB bank debt of $45 million. If the wrong people get appointed again, we are sunk as an industry, and we have a history of poor administrators

It’s not that people are saying they don’t like the look of the new NZTR board or will be opposed to the ministerial appointments to the new TAB board before they’re announced, it’s that these appointed bodies have no history of success, and the appointment process isn’t any better now than it was before.

Look at the accompanying table and examine the Net Tangible Equity line from right to left. From plus $104 million in 2008 to minus $40 million today – 12 years of pain and money evaporated – not just money but also $144 million in lost equity.

Now2019 (4)2017 (3)2013 (2)2008 (1)
Net Cash/DEBT-$45m  -$25m$40m$40m$65m
Net Tangible Equity($40m)($20m)$56m$62m$104m
Profit $135m$148m$140m$130m
Expenses$207m$211m$200m$173m$141m
Salaries/Wages$54m$61m$59m$41m$36m
Employees on >$100k1511361359338

1.     Nathan Guy takes over as the Minister for Racing
2.     Nathan Guy Minister for Racing Minister and the reign of Glenda Hughes (Chairman) and John Allen (CEO) commences (2015).
3.     Winston Peters commences as Minister for Racing 
4.     RITA is formed and Dean Mackenzie appointed as Chairman and then CEO/Chairman (Dec 2019)

But the level of wastage goes well beyond $144 million of tangible equity when you consider the cash cow known as the TAB, previously known as the New Zealand Racing Board, for all those years fuelled a ‘gravy train’ of spending the profits on themselves rather than increasing stakes to keep the industry healthy.

We had legislation known as the Racing Act of 2003 but the very reason for the legislation to keep racing in a healthy state with responsible governance was completely ignored – yet there was no accountability.

What is the point of passing legislation for racing if the incumbents decide to act in a less than above-board manner and ignore it?

What is the point of passing legislation for racing if the incumbents decide to act in a less than above-board manner and ignore it? The Legislation Police do not exist, and it’s as much a problem today as it was then.

Things started to go very wrong in the first decade of the 21st Century when some bright spark decided to sell the four-story building owned at 180 Taranaki Street.

The board took the view that NZTR shouldn’t be in the property business and, on March 1st, 2005, sold the building for $2.4 million – it had been inherited from the New Zealand Racing Conference. What would it be worth today? NZTR didn’t use all four floors and had rented out space to local businesses.

After the Taranaki Street property was sold, NZTR resided rent-free with NZRB at Petone for the next three years but was then charged rent at commercial rates – which they have paid ever since. How to go from wealthy landlords to poverty-stricken tenants in one easy lesson?

Fast forward to 2013 when that esteemed Minister of Racing Nathan Guy appointed fellow National cohort and National Party director Glenda Hughes

Fast forward to 2013 when that esteemed Minister of Racing Nathan Guy appointed fellow National cohort and National Party director Glenda Hughes as Chair of the NZRB on August 1st – and let the nepotism commence.

During the Hughes reign, the Petone property was sold for $9 million when on the books at $21 million.

Hughes appointed John Allen (shifted sideways from Foreign Affairs) who appointed Glen Saville who went off to Ireland alone to strike up deals for a fixed-odds betting platform (FOB) with Paddy Power and Openbet. He, Hughes,and John Allen spent $50 million on the FOB and, with his board’s approval, committed the TAB to $17 million per year in updates to keep everything working. Glen Saville had previously worked for Tom Waterhouse Bookmaking for about three years.

Saville has since gone from the TAB to reportedly work for Donbest in the USA, which is in the same ownership group as Openbet and Scientific Games based in Las Vegas.

Decisions essentially made by four people oversaw this massive decline

Decisions essentially made by four people oversaw this massive decline. Earlier in 2011, Michael Stiassny collected $77,000 in director fees in the same year he drove the Typhoon Betting Platform, which was written-off before it was ever turned on at a reputed overall cost of between $20 and $30 million.

Stiassny also employed Andrew Brown as the CEO on an annual salary of almost $1 million. Brown was followed by Bayley who was followed by Allen – the triumvirate of tragedy.

The 12-year decline is a real figure, yet the one constant during those 12 years is that you can pull up any of the annual reports, and the chairperson and CEO’s addresses all have a common theme of telling you how well they have done.

The TAB Annual Report released last week has Executive Chair Dean McKenzie’s report reading as though he’d just won an Oscar at the Academy Awards. He finishes with a long list of acknowledgments.

It reads in part: “And finally, I would like to acknowledge and thank the entire racing industry. At many times through the year, feedback from the industry has been robust. I put this down to the overwhelming passion through which participants approach the sport they love, combined with demands of such a comprehensive reform programme.

“However, we are by no means in the home straight.”- Dean McKenzie

McKenzie also said: “This year will go down as a year like no other. Yet, through it all, the new foundations for the industry are now firmly set. However, we are by no means in the home straight.”

“Home straight.” You have to be kidding, we have three laps to go before the $45 million owed to the ASB is paid down and we can look at increasing stakes.

The Executive Chair’s Report makes no mention of the bank debt or the plight of the owner who ultimately pays for the product on which the punters bet to provide the diabolically low level of prizemoney. They are the three issues that really matter; the rest is detail.

But I am not telling you anything new. The narrative in all these annual reports can be filed under the ‘smoke and mirrors’ category, and anyone in racing who has bothered to read them will know that by now.

The reason for dragging up this unsavoury history once more is not to make you feel ill, but to simply remind the industry that we could do without a repeat of these mistakes mentioned above, as the new CEO for the TAB is in the process of selection, and the ministerially appointed panel of Alan Galbraith QC, Liz Dawson and Anne Urlwin consider who the seven people will be to make up the new 7-person TAB Board.

From their collective knowledge, Galbraith, Dawson and Urlwin will recommend to the Minister the people who will run wagering in NZ

From their collective knowledge, Galbraith, Dawson and Urlwin will recommend to the Minister the people who will run wagering in NZ. Wagering is a very specialised business and once they have made their choices, will the Minister Grant Robertson (who’s wagering experience is that he likes a bet) be armed with the correct information to make educated decisions?

RITA first advertised for CEO pre-COVID19, which delayed the process, but the whispers say two Australians were interviewed, and a third under consideration has withdrawn his application since learning the remuneration offered for the position was reduced to $350,000.

The previous incumbent CEO, John Allen, was taking home $680,000. This year’s annual report identifies the top salary as $520,000, which is likely to relate to Executive Chair Dean McKenzie. It also says 51 employees earned $100,000 or more, which is a substantial increase numerically from the previous but may relate to severance packages more than annual packages.

The pressure is on to get a board that can turn this ship around. The industry at large may be ambivalent about appointments, but the changing of the guard has never been so crucial because repeating history isn’t an option.